Access to Health Care

ACS CAN advocates for policies that provide access to treatments and services people with cancer need for their care - including those who may be newly diagnosed, in active treatment and cancer survivors.

Private Health Insurance Resources:

ACS CAN provided comments on CMS' Draft 2016 Letter to Issuers in the Federally-facilitated Marketplaces, including comments related to network adequacy, provider directories, nondiscrimination provisions, and other issues.

ACS CAN filed comments on the 2016 Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters proposed rule, including comments related to Special Enrollment Periods, prescription drug benefits, nondiscrimination, cost-sharing requirements, network adequacy standards, and other issues.

As the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) updated its Managed care Plan Network Adequacy Model Act (Network Adequacy Model Act), ACS CAN filed comments urging the NAIC to adopt policies that would ensure that health plan networks are sufficient to provide enrollees with access to a sufficient number and type of providers (including oncology services) to meet the needs of the enrollees.

For persons living with cancer, access to specialty practitioners is paramount. Millions of Americans are now choosing health coverage through the new insurance Marketplaces and these enrollees need to be able to easily determine whether specific physicians are in a plan’s network.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded access to health insurance through reforms of the private health insurance market, including income-related premium support and cost-sharing subsidies and establishment of Health Insurance Marketplaces.

It is critically important for cancer patients to be able to access clear, consistent, and comparable information on prescription drug coverage, including coverage of physician-administered drugs, in order to choose a health plan. Prior to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), such information was not widely available, but various ACA provisions aim to improve the comprehensiveness, comparability, and transparency of health plan benefits.

This analysis examines two issues of particular interest to the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN) and its members: the extent of coverage and cost-sharing for cancer drugs, and whether information on the coverage of cancer drugs can be readily obtained, compared, and understood by patients.

Utilization management is a collection of treatment review and cost reduction techniques used by health insurers and health plans. Health plans frequently employ utilization management techniques in their prescription drug benefit, particularly for high-cost specialty medications.

This report highlights the severe challenges cancer patient may face in paying for life-saving care even when they have private health insurance.

  •  

Medicare Resources:

ACS CAN provided comments on CMS' initiation of a national coverage analysis for cervical cancer screening with a combination of HPV and cytology (Pap) testing.

ACS CAN commented on the Medicare CY2015 Physician Fee Schedule, in which we urged, among other things for CMS to designate screeming colonoscopioes that resule in polyp removal or biopsy as a preventive service.  We also commented on the proposed provisions related to the Chronic Care Management code.

ACS CAN commented in the FY2015 Medicare Hospice payment rule.

ACS CAN commented in the FY2015 Medicare Hospice payment rule, in which we urged, among other things, for Medicare to develop a workable solution to better clarify when a prescription drug is covered under the Hospice or Part D benefit.

ACS CAN filed comments in response to the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation's (CMMI's) request for information on specialty practitioner payment model opportunities.  ACS CAN's comments urged CMMI to pay particular attention to the impact various payment policies would have on a beneficiary's access to care.

In a letter to CMS Administrator Tavenner, ACS CAN joined other organizations urging CMS to reqire Medicare Advantage plans to provide coverage for clinical trials.

ACS CAN filed extensive comments in response to CMS' proposed rule implementing changes to the Medicare Part C and D programs, including opposing proposed changes to the Part D six protected classes.

This analysis examines two issues of particular interest to the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN) and its members: the extent of coverage and cost-sharing for cancer drugs, and whether information on the coverage of cancer drugs can be readily obtained, compared, and understood by patients.

Approximately 160 provisions in the final health care legislation will directly impact the millions of Americans who have or will face cancer. The following is a list of the most important provisions for the cancer community:

  •  

Health Equity Resources:

Despite the fact that US cancer death rates have decreased by 26 percent from 1991 to 2015, not all Americans have benefited equally from the advances in prevention, early detection, and treatments that have helped achieve these lower rates.

On November 10, 2015, ACS CAN hosted the first National Summit on Health Equity in St. Louis, Missouri. The summit brought together over 150 innovative thinkers in public policy, business, technology, academia, patient care, community health, and patient advocacy to examine public policy solutions for assuring greater health equity for cancer patients in the evolving health care system.

Medicaid Resources:

ACS CAN CMS Comments on Massachusetts 1115 Demonstration Waiver

ACS CAN CMS Comments on Maine 1115 Demonstration Waiver

ACS CAN CMS First Comments on Massachusetts 1115 Demonstration Waiver

ACS CAN CMS Comments on Arkansas 1115 Demonstration Waiver

ACS CAN CMS Comments on Wisconsin 1115 Demonstration Waiver

ACS CAN, the American Heart Association, the American Diabetes Association released a joint statement providing principles for any entitlement reform proposal.

ACS CAN, the American Heart Association, the American Diabetes Association released a joint statement in support of the Medicaid program, noting that any reforms should improve the value of care provided under the program and should not reduce access for Medicaid beneficiaries.

  •