Site Search
Search Results
Coalition: Legislature Missed Chance to Improve Kansas’ Health
... Kan. – In response to the adjournment of the 2017 session of the Kansas Legislature, a broad coalition of leading national, state and local health organizations issued the following statement: “The Legislature missed out on an opportunity to prevent the smoking-related premature ... 61,000 Kansas children. “By failing to implement a $1.50-per-pack cigarette tax increase, Kansas missed a significant opportunity to improve health. Significantly raising the price of tobacco decreases the number of youth who start smoking, increases the number of smokers who quit, cuts health care costs, and reduces deaths from lung and other cancers, heart attacks, strokes and other preventable diseases. A $1.50 tobacco tax increase ...
Leading Health Groups Outline Guidance on Outcomes-Based Incentives
EDINA, Minn. (July 17, 2012) A forward-thinking new initiative by a group of leading health care organizations has produced the industry's most consensus-driven guidance for the use of outcomes-based incentives in employer-sponsored wellness (or health management) programs. The guidance is intended to help ensure that worksite wellness programs utilizing such incentives are effective and ...
Minnesota Tobacco Tax Increase a Victory for Public Health
Washington, D.C. May 21, 2013 Minnesota public health advocates celebrated a victory today, as the legislature sent a $1.60 cigarette tax increase to Governor Mark Dayton 's desk that will ... and raise the current state cigarette tax of $1.23 per pack to a new total of $2.83. State lawmakers are increasingly recognizing the public health benefits of raising taxes on tobacco products as an effective tool for reducing smoking rates, protecting kids and ultimately decreasing health care spending, said John R. Seffrin, chief executive officer of the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN). Not only does a ...
7-6-12 Affordable Care Act Update
Supreme Court Decision ACS CAN is continuing to review last week's historic Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to gain a full understanding of the impact of the decision on people with cancer and their families. In the meantime, we are pleased ... that Congress had exceeded its authority under the US Constitution in two primary ways: 1) By requiring most Americans to obtain or purchase health insurance by 2014 (the so-called "individual mandate"); and 2) By requiring states to expand Medicaid eligibility beyond its current scope ... feature of any tax is to produce at least some revenue for the government. Essentially, the Court ruled that the penalty for not purchasing health insurance "looks like a tax in many respects" and will yield revenue for the government; therefore, the fee that will be imposed on those ...
7-6-12 Affordable Care Act Update
Supreme Court Decision ACS CAN is continuing to review last week's historic Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to gain a full understanding of the impact of the decision on people with cancer and their families. In the meantime, we are pleased ... that Congress had exceeded its authority under the US Constitution in two primary ways: 1) By requiring most Americans to obtain or purchase health insurance by 2014 (the so-called "individual mandate"); and 2) By requiring states to expand Medicaid eligibility beyond its current scope ... feature of any tax is to produce at least some revenue for the government. Essentially, the Court ruled that the penalty for not purchasing health insurance "looks like a tax in many respects" and will yield revenue for the government; therefore, the fee that will be imposed on those ...
7-6-12 Affordable Care Act Update
Supreme Court Decision ACS CAN is continuing to review last week's historic Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to gain a full understanding of the impact of the decision on people with cancer and their families. In the meantime, we are pleased ... that Congress had exceeded its authority under the US Constitution in two primary ways: 1) By requiring most Americans to obtain or purchase health insurance by 2014 (the so-called "individual mandate"); and 2) By requiring states to expand Medicaid eligibility beyond its current scope ... feature of any tax is to produce at least some revenue for the government. Essentially, the Court ruled that the penalty for not purchasing health insurance "looks like a tax in many respects" and will yield revenue for the government; therefore, the fee that will be imposed on those ...
7-6-12 Affordable Care Act Update
Supreme Court Decision ACS CAN is continuing to review last week's historic Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to gain a full understanding of the impact of the decision on people with cancer and their families. In the meantime, we are pleased ... that Congress had exceeded its authority under the US Constitution in two primary ways: 1) By requiring most Americans to obtain or purchase health insurance by 2014 (the so-called "individual mandate"); and 2) By requiring states to expand Medicaid eligibility beyond its current scope ... feature of any tax is to produce at least some revenue for the government. Essentially, the Court ruled that the penalty for not purchasing health insurance "looks like a tax in many respects" and will yield revenue for the government; therefore, the fee that will be imposed on those ...
7-7-11 Affordable Care Act Update
... Last Thursday, a National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) task force recommended that the NAIC endorse the Access to Professional Health Insurance Advisors Act (HR 1206), which would take broker and agent commissions out of the medical loss ratio (MLR) calculation created by the Affordable Care Act. The ACA requires insurers to spend at least 80 percent of their premium revenue on health care claims and quality improvement costs. Beginning this year, insurers who miss the target are required to rebate the difference to policy ...
7-7-11 Affordable Care Act Update
... Last Thursday, a National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) task force recommended that the NAIC endorse the Access to Professional Health Insurance Advisors Act (HR 1206), which would take broker and agent commissions out of the medical loss ratio (MLR) calculation created by the Affordable Care Act. The ACA requires insurers to spend at least 80 percent of their premium revenue on health care claims and quality improvement costs. Beginning this year, insurers who miss the target are required to rebate the difference to policy ...
7-7-11 Affordable Care Act Update
... Last Thursday, a National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) task force recommended that the NAIC endorse the Access to Professional Health Insurance Advisors Act (HR 1206), which would take broker and agent commissions out of the medical loss ratio (MLR) calculation created by the Affordable Care Act. The ACA requires insurers to spend at least 80 percent of their premium revenue on health care claims and quality improvement costs. Beginning this year, insurers who miss the target are required to rebate the difference to policy ...
Type
- Action (16) Apply Action filter
- Basic page (236) Apply Basic page filter
- Event (21) Apply Event filter
- Landing Page (5) Apply Landing Page filter
- Press Release (2179) Apply Press Release filter
- Resource (34) Apply Resource filter
- State Priority (192) Apply State Priority filter
- Update (1163) Apply Update filter
Priority Issue
State
- National (477) Apply National filter
- Maine (219) Apply Maine filter
- New York (214) Apply New York filter
- Massachusetts (196) Apply Massachusetts filter
- Vermont (184) Apply Vermont filter
- New Jersey (97) Apply New Jersey filter
- Pennsylvania (77) Apply Pennsylvania filter
- Ohio (73) Apply Ohio filter
- Maryland (72) Apply Maryland filter
- North Carolina (70) Apply North Carolina filter
- California (69) Apply California filter
- Connecticut (69) Apply Connecticut filter
- Florida (59) Apply Florida filter
- Georgia (50) Apply Georgia filter
- Missouri (49) Apply Missouri filter
- Kentucky (47) Apply Kentucky filter
- Wisconsin (44) Apply Wisconsin filter
- Alabama (43) Apply Alabama filter
- Illinois (43) Apply Illinois filter
- Montana (43) Apply Montana filter
- Michigan (42) Apply Michigan filter
- South Carolina (42) Apply South Carolina filter
- West Virginia (42) Apply West Virginia filter
- Tennessee (41) Apply Tennessee filter
- Kansas (40) Apply Kansas filter
- Oklahoma (40) Apply Oklahoma filter
- Mississippi (39) Apply Mississippi filter
- Indiana (38) Apply Indiana filter
- Minnesota (38) Apply Minnesota filter
- Texas (37) Apply Texas filter
- South Dakota (36) Apply South Dakota filter
- Virginia (36) Apply Virginia filter
- Colorado (33) Apply Colorado filter
- Idaho (32) Apply Idaho filter
- Wyoming (32) Apply Wyoming filter
- Arizona (29) Apply Arizona filter
- Louisiana (29) Apply Louisiana filter
- Oregon (29) Apply Oregon filter
- Arkansas (28) Apply Arkansas filter
- New Mexico (26) Apply New Mexico filter
- Rhode Island (26) Apply Rhode Island filter
- Washington (26) Apply Washington filter
- Nebraska (25) Apply Nebraska filter
- Iowa (24) Apply Iowa filter
- New Hampshire (24) Apply New Hampshire filter
- Utah (24) Apply Utah filter
- Nevada (23) Apply Nevada filter
- Hawaii (20) Apply Hawaii filter
- Alaska (18) Apply Alaska filter
- Delaware (18) Apply Delaware filter
Policy Issue
- Prevention and Early Detection (9) Apply Prevention and Early Detection filter
- Access to Health Care (6) Apply Access to Health Care filter
- Health Equity (4) Apply Health Equity filter
- Research, Funding and Drug Development (3) Apply Research, Funding and Drug Development filter
- Funding for Research & Programs (1) Apply Funding for Research & Programs filter